No price information available at this time due to very low liquidity.
For me vs me (MEME), 24-hour volume is N/A, no change since the prior session.
Its current market capitalization is approximately N/A. Liquidity across major Solana DEXes is currently at N/A.
Trade me vs me (MEME) on Solflare
me vs me (MEME) is available to swap it instantly and set limit orders on Solflare — a non-custodial Solana wallet where you control your private keys.
Note: Solflare's built-in risk scanner has flagged potential concerns with me vs me. Always review risk assessments before trading.
Market Data for me vs me
me vs me token risks overview
Mintable - Indicates if more tokens can be created after the initial launch.
Mintable
No
Mutable - Enables changes to the token's metadata after creation.
Mutable
Yes
Freezable - Grants control to freeze token accounts and prevent transfers.
Freezable
No
Top holders - Percentage of the total supply held by the 20 largest wallets.
Top Holders %
126.74%
Total holders
66
Last risk check date
6/2/2026, 6:56:25 PM
MEME — Unverified token
Multiple tokens can use the same name and symbol. Always do your own research before trading. (Affects me vs me).
Top 10 MEME holders high ownership
The top 10 wallets hold more than 70% of the me vs me supply.
MEME lp tokens largely unlocked
A large amount of me vs me LP tokens are unlocked, allowing liquidity to be removed at any time.
Single holder ownership in MEME
One wallet holds a large amount of the me vs me supply.
Low MEME liquidity
Low amount of liquidity in the me vs me pool.
MEME high ownership concentration
Top wallets hold more than 80% of the me vs me supply.
Low number of LP providers for MEME
Only a few users are providing liquidity for me vs me.
You can buy, sell, or swap me vs me directly in Solflare Wallet:
Open Solflare (mobile app or browser extension)
Navigate to the Swap tab
Select MEME as the token you want to buy or sell
Enter the amount and confirm the swap
Solflare uses smart order routing across all major Solana DEXes to find you the best available price. You can also set limit orders or use DCA (dollar-cost averaging) to automate your trades. For the full walkthrough, see How to Buy me vs me.
me vs me is not verified on Solana's token registry, and Solflare's built-in risk scanner has flagged potential concerns. Solflare surfaces on-chain risk data—including holder concentration, mint authority, freeze authority, and liquidity metrics—so you can assess the risks before making any decisions. Exercise caution and always do your own research.
Solflare Wallet includes a built-in Privacy Aggregator that supports private transfers for select Solana tokens. When enabled, Private Send hides the direct on-chain link between sender and recipient wallets—improving financial privacy without external tools. Private Send is optional, disabled by default, and can be enabled per transaction on both mobile and browser extension. Check Solflare to see if me vs me is currently supported for private transfers.
The safest way to store me vs me is in a non-custodial wallet like Solflare. Non-custodial means you hold your own private keys—no third party can access, freeze, or control your funds. Solflare supports hardware wallet integration for additional security, and includes a built-in Privacy Aggregator for private transfers that hide the on-chain link between sender and recipient. Available on mobile (iOS and Android) and as a browser extension.
The official Solana contract address for me vs me is 81vY2aYJS8FEVKoXys5amR3BYmW3TVgm8T3sS1adkfZR. Always verify the contract address before trading to avoid scams. You can confirm the correct address by searching for MEME directly in Solflare Wallet.
me vs me is not currently verified on Solana's token registry. Unverified tokens may carry higher risk. Solflare displays verification status and on-chain risk data for every token, helping you identify potential concerns before trading. Always do your own research.
Multiple tokens can use the same name and symbol. Always do your own research before trading. The top 10 wallets own over 70% of me vs me, raising centralization risks. A large share of liquidity is unlocked for me vs me, so it could be removed at any time. A single wallet controls a large share of me vs me, creating centralization risk. me vs me has limited liquidity, making trades harder and prices more volatile. Over 80% concentration of me vs me in a few wallets limits fair distribution. Only a handful of LP providers support me vs me, raising stability concerns.
Disclaimer: This information is for educational purposes only and not financial advice. Always do your own research. Data provided by rugcheck.xyz.
Website
19.83%